About Social Policy Signalling Index
Our mission, approach, and commitment to transparency
Our Mission
The Social Policy Signalling Index provides a transparent, data-driven view of institutional policy signalling across countries. Our goal is to offer researchers, analysts, and the public a descriptive tool for understanding how different nations approach contemporary social policy issues.
We believe in radical transparency: all our data sources, methodologies, and algorithms are publicly documented and open to scrutiny.
Our Approach
Neutrality & Objectivity
This index is descriptive, not prescriptive. We measure the intensity of institutional signalling without making value judgments about whether policies are "good" or "bad."
Data-Driven
All scores are derived from publicly available sources: government publications, legislative records, news articles, corporate reports, and verified datasets. We cite every source and make our aggregation methods transparent.
Continuous Improvement
We update our data daily and refine our methodology based on feedback. All changes to weights, dimensions, or algorithms are documented in our public change log.
What We Measure
The index tracks institutional signalling across seven dimensions:
- Speech and expression regulations
- Diversity, equity, and inclusion policies
- Education and curriculum content
- Media and platform moderation
- Legislative and regulatory activity
- Corporate and investor emphasis on social criteria
- Protest and activism frequency
For detailed methodology, see our Methodology page.
What We Don't Measure
It's equally important to understand what this index does not measure:
- Individual beliefs, attitudes, or values
- Policy effectiveness or outcomes
- Quality of life or well-being (though we show related indexes for context)
- Moral or ethical assessments
- Predictions about future policy directions
Governance & Appeals
Change Log
We maintain a public change log documenting all modifications to our methodology, including weight adjustments, dimension definitions, and data source changes.
Appeals Process
If you believe a country's score is based on inaccurate data or a source is miscategorized, you can submit an appeal. We review all submissions and respond within two weeks.
Source Takedown
If a cited source is found to be erroneous, paywalled after publication, or otherwise unreliable, we will remove it from our calculations and update affected scores.
Contact & Feedback
We welcome feedback, questions, and suggestions for improvement.
For questions about methodology: Contact our research team
For data corrections: Submit an appeal through the contact form
For technical issues: Report bugs on our GitHub repository
Disclaimer
This index is an aggregation of publicly available information describing institutional signalling activity. It is descriptive, not prescriptive, and should not be used as a sole basis for policy, legal, investment, or personal decisions.
The content presented here does not target or discriminate against protected classes. We focus on institutional policies and organizational signalling, not individuals or groups.